Mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 157:19

נימא כתנאי

R'Simeon, who also in the case of the mikweh makes it doubtful. For it was taught: All acts of purification which have been heretofore effected through it, whether in private or in public ground, are unclean. R'Simeon ruled: In public ground, they are clean; in private ground, they are in suspense.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., doubtful.');">²⁷</span> But in the view of the Rabbis it is retrospectively tebel!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. sc. the wine for which terumah was separated from this barrel hitherto. This contradicts Samuel, as before.');">²⁸</span> - There it is different, because one can say: 'Let the tebel stand in its presumptive status and say that it was not made fit.' On the contrary, let the wine stand in its presumptive status and say that it had not turned acid? - But lo! it is acid before you. Then here too, she stands a bogereth before you? - She has [only] just now become a bogereth. Then here too [let us say,] 'It has [only] just now turned acid'? - There, there are two unfavourable conditions;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' (i) The presumptive status of the tebel; and (ii) its present acidity.');">²⁹</span> but here there is only one.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 407, n. 7.');">³⁰</span> Shall we say: It is a dispute of Tannaim?

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 157:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.